Thomas W. Carter and Mary M. Carter v. City of Salina and the Salina City Council
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants Thomas W. Carter and Mary M. Carter, husband and wife (Carters or Appellants), appeal from the district court’s order, following trial to the court on stipulated facts, denying them in-junctive relief which, if granted, would have permitted Carters to sell certain property they own in the City of Salina, Utah, for restaurant-commercial purposes in contravention of the terms of a void zoning ordinance. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. A review of the agreed-to facts should aid in focusing on the issue…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sinclair Pipe Line Co. v. Village of Richton ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Nesbit v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- United States v. Richard B. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Schoeller v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Thatcher Enterprises v. Cache County CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Onyx Properties LLC v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Edwards v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Wilson v. Al McCord Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- H.D v. Greektown, LLC v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.