Legal Opinion

South v. Wishard

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 3, 1954No. Civ. 4655PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Plaintiff and appellant brought this action to quiet title to and establish a trust in certain oil rights, and for an accounting. The original complaint alleged that plaintiff was the owner of a one-sixteenth interest of all oil, gas and other hydrocarbon substances saved and produced from certain described parcels of land in Fresno County, which rights were commonly known as landowner’s royalty; that defendants H. A. Wishard, Stella Wishard, his wife, and Maudine Brown, claim and assert an interest therein adverse to plaintiff and that their claims “in said land or premises . . . ” or “said…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Orloff v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Ephraim v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Livermore v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stafford v. BallingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. South v. WishardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Santoro v. CarboneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Cortez v. WeymouthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. South v. WishardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API