Legal Opinion

South v. Wishard

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1956No. Civ. 21668PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Plaintiff South appeals from a judgment of dismissal as to defendants Harry A. Wishard and Stella Wishard, his wife, following the sustaining of their demurrer to plaintiff’s second amended complaint without leave to amend. The property in litigation consists of overriding oil and gas royalties from wells in Fresno County and sums derived therefrom. Plaintiff alleges that he is the owner of l/16th of 100 per cent of production from the land, which royalty interest stands in the name of Harry A. Wishard, who holds the same for the use and benefit of plaintiff as trustee of a constructive…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Cox v. SchnerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Stromerson v. AverillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rosenaur v. SchererCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Dame v. MileskiWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Tinsley v. Palo Alto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. In Re Marriage of NicolaidesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Hicks v. ClaytonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API