Legal Opinion

Ephraim v. Metropolitan Trust Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1946No. Sac. 5677PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

In 1927, the owners of certain real property in the county of El Dorado conveyed it to Metropolitan Trust Company of California. Three years later, the parties executed a declaration of trust reciting that the trust company held the property as security for the payment of two promissory notes. The successors in interest of the trustors declare that a conveyance made by the trustee, following an asserted default in payment of one of these notes, is invalid, and the appeal is from a judgment based upon an order sustaining demurrers to their complaint with leave to amend.

In the first count of…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Orloff v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Castro v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. DuffillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Ward v. WatermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Piambino v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Livitsanos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Orange County Water District v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Ray v. HanischCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API