Robin Fortyune v. City of Lomita
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
In this case, we must decide whether Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) requires local governments to provide accessible on-street parking in the absence of regulatory design specifications for on-street parking facilities. We hold that it does.
I. BACKGROUND
Robin Fortyune is a paraplegic who uses a wheelchair for mobility. He filed suit against the City of Lomita (“City”) in state court, alleging that he experiences “great difficulty, discomfort and, even[ ] fear for his safety” when frequenting facilities in the City because none of the City’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- PGA Tour, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Pierce v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Reese v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Guillermo Robles v. Dominos Pizza LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Ivana Kirola v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Alboniga v. School Board of Broward County FloridaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
- Naaaom v. Charter Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Kirola v. City of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.