Legal Opinion

Robin Fortyune v. City of Lomita

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 5, 2014No. 12-56280PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAEZ, Circuit Judge:

In this case, we must decide whether Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) requires local governments to provide accessible on-street parking in the absence of regulatory design specifications for on-street parking facilities. We hold that it does.

I. BACKGROUND

Robin Fortyune is a paraplegic who uses a wheelchair for mobility. He filed suit against the City of Lomita (“City”) in state court, alleging that he experiences “great difficulty, discomfort and, even[ ] fear for his safety” when frequenting facilities in the City because none of the City’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. PGA Tour, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Pierce v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Reese v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Guillermo Robles v. Dominos Pizza LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Ivana Kirola v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Alboniga v. School Board of Broward County FloridaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
  4. Naaaom v. Charter Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. Kirola v. City of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API