Legal Opinion
Pierce v. County of Orange
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 24, 2008No. 05-55829, 05-55845PublishedCited by 437 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on March 24, 2008 and published at 519 F.3d 985 (9th Cir.2008), is AMENDED as follows:(1) At 519 F.3d at 1016, after the sentence ending, “with or without reasonable accommodations, meet the essential eligibility requirements to participate,” insert the following additional two sentences:
Whether this “program access” standard may reasonably be met or whether any restriction on access is reasonably related to a legitimate government objective is necessarily fact-specific. We also emphasize that the district court should look at the offerings as a whole and in their…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by437 opinions
- Wright v. New York State Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Bull v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Adree Edmo v. Corizon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Randleman v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Graves v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
432 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.