Legal Opinion

Ivana Kirola v. City & County of San Francisco

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 22, 2017No. 14-17521PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act provides that “no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity.” 42 U.S.C. § 12132. We address whether the City and County of San Francisco have complied with their obligations under this law. In particular, we are concerned with whether San Francisco’s public right-of-way, pools, libraries, parks, and recreation…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Joseph Pakootas v. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Guillermo Robles v. Dominos Pizza LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Campbell v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. Chris Langer v. Milan KiserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  5. American Diabetes Ass'n v. US Dept. of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API