Legal Opinion

Reese v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 29, 2011No. 10-35128PublishedCited by 380 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. (“BPXA”) appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part BPXA’s motion to dismiss a securities fraud action filed against it by Claude A. Reese (“Reese”) on behalf of a class of purchasers of BP p.l.c. shares. On an interlocutory appeal, which was accepted by our court, BPXA asserts that Reese’s surviving claims do not state a claim, warranting dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), because he has pled neither an actionable misrepresentation made by or attributable to BPXA nor sufficient…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by380 opinions

  1. Claude Reese v. Robert MaloneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. In re: Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  4. Genesee County Employees' Retirement System v. Thornburg Mortgage Securities TrustDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
  5. Robin Fortyune v. City of LomitaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

375 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API