Jewel Tea Co. v. Grissom
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, P. J.
Plaintiff -brought this action seeking to restrain defendants from soliciting on an established route in Lawrence and Meade counties customers known to defendants by reason of their former employment with the plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
The allegations of the • complaint, so far as it is necessary to recite them, are in substance as follows: The plaintiff is a -corporation engaged in the business of selling at retail teas, coffees, baking powder, spices, and other products; that its business is conducted by soliciting consumers and making…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Empire Steam Laundry v. LozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- People's Coat, Apron & Towel Supply Co. v. LightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Guggenhime & Co. v. LamantiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Pasadena Ice Co. v. ReederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Garst v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Donahue v. Permacel Tape Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
- 1st American Systems, Inc. v. RezattoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Johnston v. American Speedreading Academy, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Bushman v. Pure Plant Food International, Ltd.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.