Legal Opinion

Bushman v. Pure Plant Food International, Ltd.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1983No. 13644PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

ACTION

Appellees, by their complaint, sought to recover: 1) unpaid bonuses allegedly owed them by appellant; and 2) double damages under SDCL 60-11-7 for the fraudulent, oppressive, or malicious withholding of bonuses. Appellant counterclaimed averring salary and expenses were owed because ap-pellees served a competitor’s interest. Ap-pellees filed an amended complaint including a cause of action for appellee Ritter’s medical expenses incurred after appellant allowed his insurance to lapse.

A jury trial ensued resulting in verdicts of: $3,268.56 as double damages for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bernard v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Hartung v. BillmeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Sanitary Farm Dairies, Inc. v. WolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. Hobson v. EatonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  5. Southern California Disinfecting Co. v. LomkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Landers-Scelfo v. Corporate Office System, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Setliff v. AkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Paint Brush Corp. v. NeuSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Mahan v. Avera St. Luke'sSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Abbiati v. Buttura & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API