Bushman v. Pure Plant Food International, Ltd.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Justice.
ACTION
Appellees, by their complaint, sought to recover: 1) unpaid bonuses allegedly owed them by appellant; and 2) double damages under SDCL 60-11-7 for the fraudulent, oppressive, or malicious withholding of bonuses. Appellant counterclaimed averring salary and expenses were owed because ap-pellees served a competitor’s interest. Ap-pellees filed an amended complaint including a cause of action for appellee Ritter’s medical expenses incurred after appellant allowed his insurance to lapse.
A jury trial ensued resulting in verdicts of: $3,268.56 as double damages for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bernard v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hartung v. BillmeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Sanitary Farm Dairies, Inc. v. WolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Hobson v. EatonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Southern California Disinfecting Co. v. LomkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Landers-Scelfo v. Corporate Office System, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Setliff v. AkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Paint Brush Corp. v. NeuSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Mahan v. Avera St. Luke'sSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Abbiati v. Buttura & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.