Legal Opinion

Grace v. Croninger

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1922No. Civ. No. 3992PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff Theodosia Cook Grace, as the owner and lessor of certain premises situate in the city and county of San Francisco, was given judgment in this action against the defendants Hermann Croninger and Ernest Mohr as lessees, and against W. A. Frederick as guarantor, for the sum of $9,100, due as rent for the use of those premises, together with $750.05 interest, and $910 attorney’s fees. From that judgment the defendant Frederick alone appeals. The action was dismissed as against the defendants Williams, Ruhstaller and Christensen.

The lessees Croninger and Mohr occupied…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. German-American Sav. Bank v. GollmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Teachout v. BogyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Bagley v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Callahan v. LoughranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Burgett v. LoebIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Niederer v. FerreiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Associated Creditors' Agency v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Stockburger v. DolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Boliver v. Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1977
  5. T&R Painting Construction Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API