Legal Opinion
Ortega v. Farmers Insurance Group
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 6, 1991No. C2-91-240PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
After respondent Farmers Insurance Group discontinued appellant Maria Ortega’s no-fault benefits, Ortega sought arbitration. The arbitrator found in favor of Farmers, and Ortega moved the district court to vacate the arbitration award. The court refused to vacate the arbitrator’s award. We affirm.
FACTS
Ortega was involved in a motor vehicle accident on January 17, 1987. The vehicle in which she was riding was insured by Farmers. After paying Ortega’s chiropractic treatment bills for several months, Farmers sought an independent medical examination. By certified letter dated…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hilltop Construction, Inc. v. Lou Park ApartmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Children's Hospital, Inc. v. Minnesota Nurses Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Castor v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- David Co. v. Jim W. Miller Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
3Cited by5 opinions
- Neal v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Barneson v. Western National Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Arbitration of Keim v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Neal v. State Farm Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State Farm v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004