Legal Opinion

Castor v. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 23, 1988No. C3-87-1036PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Justice.

Petitioners John E. Castor, et al., (petitioners) sought an alternative writ of mandamus to compel condemnation proceedings by the City of Minneapolis (city), arising from the city’s construction of an enclosed pedestrian “skyway” adjacent to petitioner’s office building. The district court dismissed the petition, and the court of appeals affirmed, on the ground that any damage to petitioner’s easements of light, view and air was not compensable because the elevated pedestrian walkway over a public alley constitutes a proper street use. We find the skyway in this case…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Cater v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Adams v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  4. McCarthy v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Haeussler v. BraunSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Breza v. City of MinnetristaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Manco of Fairmont, Inc. v. Town Board of Rock Dell TownshipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Neal v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Principal Financial Group v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Grossman Investments v. State Ex Rel. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API