Legal Opinion
Neal v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 10, 1995No. C4-93-647PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
529 N.W.2d 330 (1995)
Michele NEAL, Respondent,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, Appellant.
No. C4-93-647.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
March 10, 1995.
William M. Hart, Joseph W.E. Schmitt, Meagher & Geer, Minneapolis, and Bradley T. Cosgriff, Hopkins, for appellant.
Mark E. Gilbert, Kalina, Wills, Woods, Gisvold & Clark, Minneapolis, for respondent.
Kay Nord Hunt, Lommen, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, P.A., Minneapolis, for amicus curiae Ins. Federation of MN.
Mary C. Cade, Schwebel, Goetz & Sieben, Minneapolis, for amicus curiae MN Trial Lawyers Ass'n.
Heard, considered and decided by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Castor v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Huntt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Ortega v. Farmers Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Williams v. DorseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Weaver v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Brito v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Alpine Glass, Inc. v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Gilder v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.