Legal Opinion
David Co. v. Jim W. Miller Construction, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 8, 1989No. C6-88-327, C4-88-830PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Justice.
Appellant Jim W. Miller Construction, Inc. (Miller) contracted with respondent David Company to construct seven townhouses in two phases on a lot owned by respondent on Big Detroit Lake. Following completion of the first phase, a dispute arose between the parties respecting claimed defective workmanship. 1 Arbitrators chosen to resolve the dispute, as part of their award, ordered the general contractor (Miller) to purchase the real property on which the subject buildings had been erected. The issue presented to us is whether in so doing the arbitrators exceeded their powers. A…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- State v. BerthiaumeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Cournoyer v. American Television & Radio Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Willoughby Roofing & Supply Co. v. Kajima International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bruce v. ColeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- JBC of Wyoming Corp. v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. National Chiropractic Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Michael-Curry Companies v. Knutson Shareholders Liquidating TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corporation, Sining MaoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.