Legal Opinion

Arbitration of Keim v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 31, 1992No. C7-91-2226PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AMUNDSON, Judge.

This case involves appellant’s eligibility for no-fault benefits. At the time of his injury appellant was unemployed. After respondent insurance company refused to pay appellant income loss benefits, he petitioned for mandatory arbitration and was awarded $6,245.00 in income loss benefits. Respondent moved to vacate the arbitrator’s award. The trial court concluded the arbitrator exceeded his power, vacated the arbitration award, and ordered a rehearing. The arbitrator responded by affidavit that a rehearing was unnecessary because his decision would not change. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Hilltop Construction, Inc. v. Lou Park ApartmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Darby v. American Family Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Ortega v. Farmers Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Demning v. Grain Dealers Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roquemore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Neutgens v. Westfield GroupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API