Legal Opinion

Neal v. State Farm Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 1, 1994No. C4-93-647PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

The trial court vacated an arbitration award that allowed appellant to recover further no-fault benefits after failing to attend an Independent Medical Examination (IME). The trial court concluded that appellant’s unreasonable failure to attend an IME automatically allows the insurer to terminate payment of further no-fault benefits. We reverse.

FACTS

In 1989, appellant was injured in a car accident. Because of those injuries, appellant incurred wage loss and medical expenses. Appellant was reimbursed by her no-fault insurer, respondent State Farm Insurance Company.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Glidden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Park Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 32Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. State v. HammSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. In Re Estate of TurnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. DorseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. Neal v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API