Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Monsour
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 23, 1997No. 233 Disc. 3PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NEWMAN, Justice.
Respondent Robert D. Monsour (Monsour) has filed exceptions to the Disciplinary Board’s report recommending his disbarment.
On November 1, 1991, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel filed a Petition for Discipline against Monsour, alleging that he had violated the Rules of Professional Conduct by mishandling client funds. A three-member hearing committee held hearings on July 27, 1992 and November 18, 1992. Based on a Petition to Reopen the Record filed by Monsour, the committee held an additional hearing on September 12, 1994, for the limited purpose of allowing Monsour…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LucariniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BraunSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KneppSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ChristieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Huber v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. PozonskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Nesselrotte v. Allegheny Energy, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. QuigleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Huber v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.