Legal Opinion

Pascoe v. Richards

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1962No. Civ. 35PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Plaintiff commenced this action to quiet his title to four lode mining claims known as Barite Star 1, Barite Star 2, Barite Star 3 and Barite Star 4, all situated in a wilderness area in Tulare County. Defendant answered, denying plaintiff’s allegation of ownership and claimed title in himself to Barite Star 2, 3 and 4, by virtue of prior lode locations designated as Baro 1, Baro 2 and Baro 3, respectively. He also filed a cross-complaint to quiet his title to the three Baro claims. Each of plaintiff’s Barite Star 2, 3 and 4 cover substantially, but not exactly, the same area as each of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Key v. McCabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daly v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Eveleigh v. DarnielleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API