Pascoe v. Richards
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Plaintiff commenced this action to quiet his title to four lode mining claims known as Barite Star 1, Barite Star 2, Barite Star 3 and Barite Star 4, all situated in a wilderness area in Tulare County. Defendant answered, denying plaintiff’s allegation of ownership and claimed title in himself to Barite Star 2, 3 and 4, by virtue of prior lode locations designated as Baro 1, Baro 2 and Baro 3, respectively. He also filed a cross-complaint to quiet his title to the three Baro claims. Each of plaintiff’s Barite Star 2, 3 and 4 cover substantially, but not exactly, the same area as each of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Key v. McCabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Daly v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Eveleigh v. DarnielleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1986