Legal Opinion

Eveleigh v. Darnielle

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 1969No. Civ. 11761PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

action involves ownership of nine contiguous, unpatented mining claims known as the Yankee Jack group-, located in Shasta County. In 1962 Maurine Herrman had been the owner of these claims. Plaintiffs are her successors in interest. Between November 1964 and February 1965 defendants located four contiguous lode mining claims which overlay part of the Yankee Jack group. Defendants claim ownership on the strength of Maurine Herrman’s asserted failure to perform the annual assessment work required by federal law. 1 The trial court concluded that labor performed on behalf of Maurine Herrman…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bishop v. BaisleyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Farwell v. NeedhamOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Big Three Mining & Milling Co. v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Lind v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Schlegel v. HoughOregon Supreme Court · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Great Eastern Mines, Inc. v. Metals Corp. of AmericaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API