Legal Opinion
Bee v. Bee
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 7, 2003No. AC 21741PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant, Rudolph Bee, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dissolving his marriage to the plaintiff, Joanna Bee. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) ordered him to pay child support in an amount that deviated from the child support guidelines, (2) ordered him to pay the plaintiff $25,000 in attorney’s fees, (3) ordered him to maintain his present life insurance for the benefit of the parties’ minor children, (4) ordered him to provide dental insurance for the minor children and (5) determined that it would retain jurisdiction over…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Weiman v. WeimanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Krafick v. KrafickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Bornemann v. BornemannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Roos v. RoosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. DeVivoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Kunajukr v. KunajukrConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Montoya v. MontoyaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Rathblott v. RathblottConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.