State v. DeVivo
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The defendant, Jason DeVivo, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his motion to vacate his guilty plea. The defendant claims that the court did not lack jurisdiction to hear the motion and that, had the court heard his motion, he would have prevailed on the merits. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following procedural facts are relevant to our analysis. On February 1, 2002, the defendant pleaded guilty to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs as a second offender in violation of General Statutes…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Brunetti v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- State v. BrunettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Barlow v. LopesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. WrightConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. BrunoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. LindoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. McCoyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.