Legal Opinion

Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Insurance Services v. Robb

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 6, 1995No. B083345PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MASTERSON, J.

In the trial court, plaintiff-employer successfully sought a preliminary injunction precluding defendant, a former employee, from using its trade secrets. However, the trial court denied the employer’s application for injunctive relief to enforce a covenant not to compete. Each party appeals. We conclude that the trial court properly declined to enforce the noncompetition covenant but erred in enjoining the former employee’s alleged misuse of trade secrets.

Background

In 1980, defendant Stanley R. Robb became employed by Infantino & Company (the Agency), an insurance…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Cohen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. IT Corp. v. County of ImperialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Aetna Building Maintenance Co. v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Vacco Industries, Inc. v. Van Den BergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Reeves v. HanlonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Whyte v. Schlage Lock CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Ajaxo Inc. v. E Trade Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. DVD Copy Control Ass'n Inc. v. BunnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Williams v. RiedmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API