Legal Opinion

Hassell v. Onslow County Board of Education

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 2008No. 172A07PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDSON, Justice.

Plaintiff employee challenges the Industrial Commission’s (“Commission’s”) determination that she is not entitled to workers’ compensation benefits because her “generalized anxiety disorder” (“GAD”) is not an occupational disease pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 97-53(13). Guided by the well-established standard of appellate review, we hold that the Commission properly concluded that plaintiff’s condition is not an occupational disease because she failed to prove either that her work increased her risk of GAD or significantly contributed to it. Consequently, we affirm the denial of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Deese v. Champion International Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Anderson v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Chaisson v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Cooper v. BHT ENTERPRISESCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Yingling v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Carey v. Norment Security IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. Myles v. LMS Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API