Legal Opinion
Sadloski v. Town of Manchester
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 26, 1995No. 15166PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff has established taxpayer standing to challenge the validity of a real property tax abatement provision based solely on the existence of the abatement provision, irrespective of other tax consequences of the real estate development project to which the abatement provision relates. The plaintiff,1 Virginia Celinski, appeals2 from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendants, the town of Manchester (town), Homart Manchester Investment Company, and The Mall at Buckland Hills Partnership (partnership), in which it…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Alarm Applications Co. v. Simsbury Volunteer Fire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. VitaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Gateway Co. v. DiNoiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. GlennSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Ferreira v. PringleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- In Re Allison G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Higgins v. KarpSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.