Legal Opinion
Lapenta v. Bank One, N.A.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 19, 2007No. AC 27738PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
A purchaser of property on which a lis pendens has been filed pursuant to General Statutes § 52-325 1 takes the property subject to the outcome of the lawsuit of which the lis pendens has given the purchaser notice. In this case, the purchaser bought the same piece of property on two separate occasions, first at the foreclosure by sale of the second mortgage and thereafter at the foreclosure by sale of the first mortgage. He claims that his first purchase entitled him to the surplus that arose from the subsequent foreclosure of the first mortgage. Relying on § 52-325, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Friezo v. FriezoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Meinket v. LevinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Washington Trust Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Brown v. SohSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- TOWN OF TRUMBULL v. PalmerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Antonino v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Tuccio Custom Homes, LLC v. LamonicaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Lopes v. FarmerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- LaPenta v. Bank One, NASupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.