Legal Opinion

Antonino v. Johnson

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 10, 2009No. AC 29131PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACH, J.

The defendant, G. Thomas Johnson, 1 appeals from the judgment of foreclosure by sale rendered in an action brought by the plaintiffs, Leo Anton-ino and Alvin J. Schechter, trustee. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) determined that written notice was not a prerequisite of the foreclosure action and (2) granted the plaintiffs’ motion for the appointment of a receiver of rents. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the resolution of the defendant’s claims. The plaintiffs commenced…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Robinson v. WeitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. State v. T.D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. State v. TDSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Biro v. MatzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  2. Moran v. MorneauConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. Danzig v. PDPA, INC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. DDS Wireless International, Inc. v. Nutmeg Leasing, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  5. Imaginative Research Associates, Inc. v. RamirezDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API