Legal Opinion
Washington Trust Co. v. Smith
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 22, 1997No. SC 15527; SC 15529PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BERDON, J.
The issues in this appeal are whether the proposed intervening defendants (proposed defendants) filed timely motions to intervene in this foreclosure action, after a court-ordered foreclosure sale had already been held, and, if timely, whether they adduced sufficient facts in support of their motions to intervene. The trial court denied the proposed defendants’ motions to intervene on the grounds that the motions were not timely and because the proposed defendants failed to prove that they had direct and substantial interests in the foreclosed property. The proposed…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, Mike Trbovich v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Frank J. Kozak v. Willard B. Wells, Administrator, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- 16 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1089, 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8164 Maria Alaniz v. Tillie Lewis Foods, Robert Beaver, Applicant-IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Webster Bank v. ZakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Willow Funding Co., L.P. v. Grencom AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Schaghticoke Tribal Nation v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.