Legal Opinion
TOWN OF TRUMBULL v. Palmer
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 17, 2010No. AC 30059PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBINSON, J.
The pro se defendant Helene B. Knopick 1 and the would-be intervenor, Linda A. Palmer, appeal from the judgment of the trial court setting a new sale date and denying their motion to open and vacate the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, the town of Trumbull, and the court’s denial of Palmer’s motions to intervene. The issues on appeal are whether the court abused its discretion by denying (1) Palmer’s motions to intervene in her individual and fiduciary capacities, and (2) the motion to open and vacate the judgment. We dismiss Palmer’s appeal and affirm the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Milford Power Co v. Alstom Power, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Isaac v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- King v. SultarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Semac Electric Co. v. Skanska USA Building, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Simmons v. WeissConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- State v. Miscellaneous FireworksConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Kawecki v. SaasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Krol v. A v. Tuchy, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.