Legal Opinion
Strode v. Sullivan
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 3, 1951No. 5592PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LA PRADE, Justice.
This is an original proceeding in mandamus commenced by the petitioners, qualified electors of the City of Phoenix, for themselves and in behalf of others similarly situated. The purpose of the proceeding is to compel the respondent, Tom Sullivan, Jr., in his capacity as City Clerk of the City of Phoenix, to accept certain petitions which the petitioners had theretofore attempted to lodge with the city clerk for the purpose of creating a new political party to be called “The Democratic Party of the City of Phoenix”, and have such party designated on the official ballots. It…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lackey v. State Ex Rel. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Clayton v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Luhrs v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- City of Tucson v. Tucson Sunshine Climate ClubArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Hackley v. EdmondsOhio Supreme Court · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Lewiston Firefighters Ass'n, Local 785 v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Public Integrity Alliance, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- City of Casa Grande v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.