Legal Opinion

Lackey v. State Ex Rel. Grant

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 11, 1911No. 2666PublishedCited by 54 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Oklahoma County; Edward Dewes Oldfield, Judge. Mandamus by the State, on relation of Whit M. Grant and others, against Dan V. Lackey and others to compel the surrender of the books, records, funds, and other property of the city, claimed to be held by them in an official capacity. Judgment for relators, and respondents bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

On the 8th day of November, 1910, in pursuance of a resolution passed by the city council of Oklahoma City, aii election was held in that city at which freeholders were elected for the purpose of writing a charter to be submitted to the qualified electors of the city. The freeholders elected at said election made, prepared, and compiled a charter to be submitted to the qualified electors for their rejection or adoption, and thereafter, on the 8th day of March, 1911, the proposed charter was voted upon at an election held, within said city, at which more than three-fourths of the voters voting…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ewing v. HoblitzelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Kansas City v. Marsh Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  3. State ex rel. Kansas City v. FieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  4. Badgley v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  5. Brunn v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Oliver v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Oklahoma News Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Walton, Mayor v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API