Legal Opinion

Hammer v. Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 20, 2011No. 05CV0875; A142677PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict for plaintiff in this premises liability action arising from personal injuries that plaintiff suffered while shopping in one of defendant’s stores. In two assignments of error, defendant challenges the trial court’s denial of its directed verdict motion and the giving of a res ipsa loquitur instruction to the jury. We affirm.

In reviewing the denial of defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, we view the evidence and reasonable inferences that can be drawn from it in the light most favorable to plaintiff. Greist v. Phillips, 322 Or 281,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Woolston v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dosanjh v. Namaste Indian Restaurant, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Hagler v. Coastal Farm Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Two Two v. Fujitec America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Cohen v. Awbrey Glen Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Fisk v. Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API