Legal Opinion

Davis v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 30, 1996No. 94CV0255; CA A87714PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

This is an action for damages for violation of the habitability requirements of the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (RLTA). The principal issue is whether a violation of the RLTA is conditioned on evidence that the landlord knew or, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known that the condition of the premises rented to the tenant did not comply with the statutory habitability standards. The trial court held that actual or constructive knowledge is required and, concluding that the record contained no evidence on that element, entered summary judgment for the defendant landlord.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Brewer v. ErwinOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bellikka v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Scovill v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Chartrand v. Coos Bay Tavern, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Deckard v. BunchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Thomas v. Dillon Family Limited Partnership IICourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. Parker v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API