Redd v. Mecklenburg Nurseries, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
On the issues submitted to the jury, the evidence was in conflict and, therefore, presented a jury question. Pascal v. Transit Co., 229 N.C. 435, 50 S.E. 2d 534; Powell v. Lloyd, 234 N.C. 481, 67 S.E. 2d 664. The motion for nonsuit at the close of all the evidence was properly overruled. For the same reason, the formal exceptions to the refusal to set aside the verdict and to the signing of the judgment were also properly overruled. The other assignments of error relate to the admissibility of evidence and to the charge of the court.
The witness W. C. Daniels, president of the defendant, on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pascal Ex Rel. Pascal v. Burke Transit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Wilson v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Powell v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Arnold v. State Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Cincinnati Butchers Supply Co. v. ConolySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- In Re the Will of CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- In Re the Will of TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963