Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1936PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

Section 8 of the general provisions of the policy in controversy reads as follows: “The insurance under this policy does not cover any loss, fatal or otherwise, sustained: while intoxicated or under the influence of or affected by, or resulting directly or indirectly from intoxicants or narcotics; while violating the law; if such violation is the direct cause of the accident; any loss contributed to or caused by any mental or bodily infirmity.”

There was only one issue submitted to the jury in the court below: “Was the deceased, E. C. Wilson, intoxicated or under the influence of or affected…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hunt v. EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. State v. . GoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Stein v. . LevinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. State v. Murray.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Boone v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. MacClure v. Accident & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. State v. . CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Gibson v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. State v. FennerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Gardner v. City of ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API