Pascal Ex Rel. Pascal v. Burke Transit Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal of the Defendant, QueeN City Coach Company.
Denny, J.
This defendant seriously contends that its motion for judgments as of nonsuit on the cross-actions of tbe Burke Transit Company, for contribution under G.S. 1-240, should have been allowed.
After the Queen City Coach Company was made a party defendant, the plaintiffs did not amend their pleadings and allege this defendant was also negligent and that such negligence concurred with the negligence of the Burke Transit Company, in causing the injuries and damages sustained by them. Therefore, the burden was upon the codefendant, Burke…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Cole v. KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Tyson v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Charnock v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Cole v. . KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Helmstetler v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Bolkhir v. North Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Thompson v. LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Ellington Ex Rel. Ellington v. BradfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Tarkington v. Printing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Rulane Gas Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.