Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Butchers Supply Co. v. Conoly

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClabksoN, J.

After a careful review of tbe evidence and charge of tbe court below, we do not think plaintiff's exceptions and assignments of error can be sustained. All tbe elements of fraud and deceit were sufficiently pleaded by defendants, and tbe evidence on tbe trial sufficient to sustain defendants’ allegations of fraud and deceit to avoid tbe contract and recover damages. On account of tbe sinister ramifications of fraud and deceit, courts seldom lay down any bard and fast rule. Tbe general allegation of fraud and deceit and proof of same is sufficiently shown on tbis record. Tbe fact, under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chaffin v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Mewborn v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. McGradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  2. Williams v. Blue Ridge Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Wyatt v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. O'Briant v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Redd v. Mecklenburg Nurseries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API