Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Arnold v. State Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 1940PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1ConcurrenceStacy, C. J.

BARNHILL and WINBORNE, JJ., join in concurring opinion. This action was brought before a justice of the peace to recover $91.55, deposited in defendant bank and not accounted for by defendant to plaintiff. The judgment of the justice of the peace was in favor of plaintiff, for amount sued for, which was appealed from to the Superior Court. The appeal certificate has this in it: "Plaintiff complained for the sum of Ninety One and 55/100 Dollars, with interest and cost, due by and on account of money deposited with said defendant and paid out without authority by said defendant and refusal, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McKinnon v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Rawls v. . LuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Hunt v. EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. State v. . GoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Wilson v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jamison v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Worsley v. S. &. W. Rendering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Hardee v. Charles Worth YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. State v. . GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Powell v. DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API