Post v. Jacobsen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
This is a proceeding in mandamus to review an administrative order of the State Director of Agriculture.
Petitioner is a farm produce dealer, licensed to act as such under the Agricultural Code (Agr. Code, § 1263). On June 5, 1958, he entered into a written contract respecting the purchase of Santa Rosa plums from a grower by the name of John Luisi. On the preceding day, pursuant to previous ar rangements, Fred Reynolds, a fruit buyer employed by petitioner, Jay Seaman, a fruit broker, and Luisi, the grower, went to the latter’s plum orchard to inspect the plum crop which was the subject of a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Mineral Park Land Co. v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Lassing v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Carter v. RhodesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Clarey v. Security Portland C. Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- San Benito Foods v. VenemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Almaden-Santa Clara Vineyards v. PaulCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Garvai v. Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.