Legal Opinion

Carter v. Rhodes

California Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1901No. S.F. No. 1885PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

The respondent, on December 24, 1894, was the owner of an interest in a certain mine known as the “Nickel Plate,” and on that date he and the appellant entered into an agreement, in writing, by which it was agreed that the respondent should sell, and he did sell, to the defendant one-half interest in said mine for the sum of five thousand dollars, four thousand dollars being paid on the execution of the agreement, and one thousand dollars balance to be paid only out of the net proceeds of the ■ working of the one-half interest in said mineral claim conveyed; “and that in no event shall the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wolf v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Bagley v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Poirier v. GravelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Love v. MaburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bollinger v. BollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Ebberts v. Carpenter Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Clarey v. Security Portland C. Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Carl v. EadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Langenberg v. GuyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API