Legal Opinion

San Benito Foods v. Veneman

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 22, 1996No. H014311PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIHARA, J.

The only questions presented in this appeal are what the correct standard of proof is in an administrative proceeding involving a threatened suspension or revocation of a food processing license and what the correct standard of review is in the superior court when a writ of administrative mandamus is sought to overturn the administrative agency’s decision to impose a stayed suspension of such a license on condition that a sum of money be paid by the licensee. We conclude that the administrative agency correctly utilized the preponderance of the evidence standard of proof, but…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Interstate Brands v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Weiner v. FleischmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Dickey v. Retirement BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Farr v. County of NevadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Wences v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Malibu Mountains Recreation, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Mann v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. The Termo Company v. LutherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API