Legal Opinion

Garvai v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1963No. Civ. 26213PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying a writ of mandate. The licenses of appellants to practice chiropractic were ordered suspended by the respondent, the Board of Chiropractic Examiners of the State of California (Board), and appellants sought mandate to require respondent to vacate its order of suspension. The cause was submitted to the superior court on the transcript of the proceedings before the Board.

Appellants were charged in separate accusations with having practiced chiropractic under fictitious and assumed names, as “Basic Diagnostic Office,” in violation of section 10, subd.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Painless Parker v. Board of Dental Exam.California Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Messner v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Cozad v. Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Smulson v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Berry v. AldersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barkin v. Bd. of Optometry of State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Cleveland Chiropractic College v. State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Steinsmith v. Medical Board of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Opinion No. (2000), California Attorney General Reports2000
  5. Opinion No. (2009), California Attorney General Reports2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API