Legal Opinion
Lassing v. James
California Supreme Court
Decided May 28, 1895No. 15673PublishedCited by 27 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
The plaintiff, Lassing, was a farmer, and the owner of several fields of growing alfalfa. He was also the owner of nine stacks of hay, amounting to about 2,700 tons, which hay. was situated in these various fields. Defendant James was the owner of a large number of cattle, and was desirous of securing both pasturage and hay upon which to feed them. Thereupon a written agreement was entered into between these two parties, which, among other things, contained the following covenants:
“ That the said party of the first part (Lassing), in *352consideration of the covenants, promises, and agreements on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dustan v. . McAndrewNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Hunter v. . WetsellNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Van Horn v. RuckerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1863
3Cited by27 opinions
- Payne v. NeuvalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Cuthill v. PeabodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- MacRae v. HeathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Gianelli v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Idaho Implement Co. v. LambachIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.