In Re Brownstein
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The accused is charged with a conflict of interest arising out of a transaction involving a small, closely held corporation, its stockholders and a third party who loaned money to the corporation and became a stockholder as part of the transaction. The accused was found guilty by the trial and review boards, both of which recommended a reprimand.
James Woods first consulted the accused in 1973 concerning the incorporation of his janitorial business. The incorporation was never consummated. Thereafter, in the fall of 1973, at the request of Woods, his father, and one Ogston, the accused…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BanksOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MumfordOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- In re Complaint as to the Conduct of BanksOregon Supreme Court · 1978
3Cited by19 opinions
- Tekni-Plex, Inc. v. Meyner & LandisNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Liquilux Gas Corp. v. Humberto BerríosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1995
- Pereira v. Allboro Building Maintenance, Inc. (In Re Allboro Waterproofing Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BristowOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrandsnessOregon Supreme Court · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.