Commonwealth v. Ludwig
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*474OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
We granted review in this case and the companion case, Commonwealth v. Lohman, 527 Pa. 492, 594 A.2d 291, to determine whether the use of closed circuit television testimony by an alleged child victim violates the confrontation clauses of the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions.1 We hold that the confrontation clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution does not permit such infringement of a defendant’s constitutional right to meet a witness face to face. The use of closed circuit television to transmit the testimony of the witness in this case violates the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. SellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AmiraultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- R. v. Com., Dept. of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- State v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1998
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.