State v. Foster
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
957 P.2d 712 (1998)
135 Wash.2d 441
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Boyd Allen FOSTER, Petitioner.
No. 64217-6.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
June 11, 1998.
Lenell Rae Nussbaum, Seattle, for petitioner.
Norm Maleng, King County Prosecutor, Amy Freedheim, Michele Hauptman, Theresa Fricke, Deputy County Prosecutors, for respondent.
GUY, Justice.
The issue in this appeal is whether RCW 9A.44.150, which, in limited circumstances, permits a child witness to testify via one way closed-circuit television rather than in the physical presence of the accused, violates the guarantees of the state or…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- State v. DardenWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. DardenWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. DyeWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2002
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.