Legal Opinion

State v. Foster

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1998No. 64217-6PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

The issue in this appeal is whether RCW 9A.44.150, which, in limited circumstances, permits a child witness to testify via one-way closed-circuit television rather than in the physical presence of the accused, violates the guarantees of the state or federal confrontation clause.

We hold that the right of an accused to confront witnesses “face to face,” as guaranteed by our state constitution, like the right guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, is not absolute. The right may be limited, in rare circumstances, when necessary to further an important state interest…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. State v. DardenWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. DardenWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. DyeWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2002

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API