Commonwealth v. Sell
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NIX, Justice.
In this appeal we have agreed to decide whether, under Article I, section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, which guarantees the citizens of this Commonwealth protection against unreasonable governmental searches and seizures, *48a defendant accused of a possessory crime will continue to have “automatic standing” to challenge the admissibility of evidence alleged to be the fruit of an illegal search and seizure. The United States Supreme Court has abolished “automatic standing” under the Fourth Amendment to the federal Constitution. United States v. Salvucci,…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by261 opinions
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. GraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. GarySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
256 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.