Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Chmiel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 19, 1999PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAYLOR, Justice.

Among the numerous issues raised in this appeal is the following: Did the trial court err in allowing the Common*483wealth to introduce into the record of Appellant David Chmiel’s second trial portions of the testimony given at an ineffectiveness hearing by Thomas Kennedy, Esq. (now deceased), counsel for Chmiel at his first trial? We conclude that the admission of such testimony was error and therefore reverse.

I. Background

David Chmiel was charged with stabbing to death three elderly siblings, Angelina, Victor, and James Lunario, while robbing their home in Throop,…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. BaumhammersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. CooperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API