Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Edmunds

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 4, 1991PublishedCited by 711 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, Justice.

I. HISTORY OF THE CASE

The issue presented to this court is whether Pennsylvania should adopt the “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule as articulated by the United States Supreme Court in the case of United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 104 S.Ct. 3405, 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984). We conclude that a “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule would frustrate the guarantees embodied in Article I, Section 8, of the Pennsylvania Constitution. Accordingly, the decision of the Superior Court is reversed.

The defendant in the instant case was found guilty…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by711 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. State v. RobinetteOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. StricklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

706 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API